Making Sense of Software Licensing
19th October 2009
Roundtable experts discuss the complexity of software licensing
and how new technologies such as SaaS and virtualisation are
putting compliance under pressure
- Experts agree that vendor programme and product licensing
models need to drive and educate rather than complicate
- Users are now having to wrestle with understanding licensing
terms of up to 150 vendors
FAST Ltd, a leading UK authority on Software Asset Management
and IT Compliance, providing software, education, consulting and
managed services, hosted a roundtable of industry licensing
specialists recently, the results of which were fascinating.
The experts gathered together to give their views on software
licensing and to examine its complexity, especially in the current
challenging economic climate.
With new technologies, and new ways to procure software such as
SaaS and virtualisation, the world of licensing is becoming more
difficult to grasp. Participants reported that adding to this
confusion is the fact that the recession has made all businesses
re-evaluate their spending habits. It has also exacerbated a major
trend that was already underway: the move from paying for IT with
large chunks of capital, towards monthly instalments financed from
operational budgets. It was agreed that the wider trend is that the
Credit Crunch will eventually reshape the way organisations buy IT,
with Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) managed and hosted services,
virtualisation and cloud computing all good examples of
this.
The roundtable event, ‘Making Sense of Licensing’, part of the
CEO Series was hosted by FAST Ltd and included software vendors
Microsoft and Oracle, together with sponsors Numara Software and
Webroot, Rocela, the BSA, the UK Oracle User Group, FAST customers
Vodafone, BrookStreet des Roches and Lloyds Register, and a
representative from industry analyst Quocirca.
A key driver for the discussion was the complexity of licences
from vendors and how best to approach individual licensing
requirements. Both Microsoft and Oracle have come under fire
from some small and large users for having licensing environments
that are seen to be difficult for them to understand.
In response to this, Emma Healey, licensing and escalation
manager at Microsoft said that the software vendor has adopted a
new approach to licensing. “There will be more of a customer
centric approach – today as a customer you can buy traditionally,
you can choose payment options to suit, pay on an annual basis, or
pay monthly. We are looking at improving both programmes and
product licensing offerings. What matters is that those programmes
meet the needs of our customers and how those customers want to buy
and manage Software Licenses purchased from us. We used to have
over 100 programmes. Now we have 17 on a worldwide basis.”
Meanwhile at Oracle, UK LMS manager, Steve Borsuk says,
“Fundamentally, Oracle's core licensing for technology hasn't
changed in 7 years. In addition, Oracle publishes all of its
price lists and provides a licensing user guide plus customer
facing documents to help explain Oracle's policies surrounding
specific topics. Whilst understanding that it is difficult
for customers to manage licensing across multiple vendors, Oracle
offers help by the License Management Services organisation to
educate customers on their contracts and licenses.”
Participants agreed that it’s the organisation’s role to help
its company get to grips with the basics of licensing, as the
people handling compliance are generally thrown into it and are not
given the education and training they need to manage the ins and
outs of licensing. And at the end of the day are still left
asking ‘am I in compliance?’
Ian Moyse, EMEA channel director at Webroot pointed out that
this means not a lot has changed.
“All the questions we’re asking are very similar to those of ten
years ago. The reality is that customers aren’t dealing with two
vendors. There could be scores of different vendors that the
customer is dealing with. For the customer, especially smaller
ones, how do they ensure that they are correctly licensed? How do
they get close enough that the vendors are happy?”
From the customers’ perspective, a key area of discussion was
the overall management of their contracts with vendors and how the
biggest issue at the moment is dealing with the cost pressures of
the current economic environment.
Corrianne Allen, contracts management specialist at Vodafone UK
commented: “The biggest trend is in strategic contracts. We are
keen to bring down IT costs and so we are tying ourselves up for
longer to bring down those costs. We want to spend time to get the
right contract in place and then spend time managing that contact
and sweating the deal.”
Mark Duffy at Lloyds Register added that he came into his role
three years ago with no background in software asset management and
has had to learn on the job.
“Our Senior Executives always looks at our software budget, say
it is far too high and are always trying to strip money out of it.
Now we are being asked to look at an ROI of 12-18 months on what we
buy or develop. It is about trying to find balance in our tactical
solutions. I’d like to see vendors have a standard contract for
software licences with terms and conditions across the board.”
On behalf of the user groups at the table, Ronan Miles at the UK
Oracle User Group mentioned that his conversations with users
suggest they believe that the complexity of software licensing
makes it difficult to understand exactly how the costs are built
up. “The suppliers deserve their slice of the piece back. The
licensing price is the taxation applied to the market to ensure
that the vendors get their revenue back. The problem with being an
Oracle customer is that it’s like sitting on a plane. You shouldn’t
ask the guy sitting next to you what he paid for his ticket.
Ian Moyse at Webroot added that at Webroot they manage
customers’ email and web security via the software as a service
(SaaS) model where, from a user’s perspective, worries about
licensing are taken care of, which is one less problem for
customers to be anxious about.
All participants agreed that there needs to be a move to educate
rather than complicate when it comes to licensing. Oracle’s
Steve Borsuk said there is one overwhelming message for
customers.
“It’s about the education. Some of the mystery can disappear if
you know where you’ve come from and where you’re going to.
Virtualisation is not going to go away. So let’s talk about adding
value to your licence. What have you got? Why have you got there?
Now, how can we go forward as partners?”
FAST Ltd’s head of consultancy, products and services, Phil
Heap, however admits that there is still some way to go in making
sense of licensing.
“We’re making the same mistakes as we did in the mainframe era.
There is still some way to go and we’re all in it together. There
has to be a collaborative effort that comes from both sides:
publishers have got to make it easier for us to manage. Industry
experts have got to help fix things together when it is
broken.”
Find out more
Find out more about FAST's Compliance
Programme, professional consultancy and
managed services or contact
us.